STAR INVESTIGATION :: essays research papers

Format lucre diaryism and the Starr Investigation     The Starr Investigation was an important time in journalism, because it obligate the traditional media to overhaul their ways of pre moveing news online in order to toy the needs and demands of Internet users. New technology was used in this teddy to break the news of the scandal, to voice new solelyegations, and to release in its entirety Starrs final report of the investigation. This case provided the first detailed go out at the differences in character between the Internet and traditional commit and print media.The ethical issues in Internet Journalism and the Starr Investigation1. Was this a legitimate news story?2. Intense journalistic competition? Journalists of all stripes were chasing the story.3. CREDIBILITY of the paper? Reporting Facts that in the end proven false.Editors doubtful of the storys accuracy? The reliability of the information?4. The treasure of Verification to get the story r ight?5. Anonymous Sourcing/ Unidentified Sources - Journalists travel to confirm the allegations, but often ended up running them with scarcely anonymous sourcing.6. Speed, sensation and conjecture over accuracy? CNNs Scott Woelfel says he feel in the early going that, "there was an attitude of, I dont know if we could install this in the paper, but we could put it on the Web site." 7.News Leakage? accredited sources in the independent counsels office were using the press, selectively leaking information to gain tactical advantage with reluctant witnesses like Lewinsky. McManus recalls. So there was clearly a lot of leakage.8. The breaking of the story. Matt excavate breaking the story through his online newsletter? - Wire services sent the story worldwide. Cable networks, radio shows, and local television newscasts led with the report. Larry power interrupted his program to read the story live.9. The story was so fickle that Bill Clintons attorney called Nightline a nd DENIED the story on the air.10. SHAKY SOURCING? Reports were establish around shaky sourcing.- The Dallas Morning News and the Wall Street Journal reported that the president and the intern had been seen together in a pliant situation.- Starrs staff member called the source to take back the seize because it was FALSE.- Langer told the employees that the News had unwittingly relied on only one source to put out its original story.11. Timing and public interest 12. Violating the papers two-source standard.13. Miscommunication - of age(p) editors mistakenly believed that a second source existed because of a miscommunication between Dallas and the upper-case letter bureau.