Character Analyzation “The guest” Albert camus Essay

Albert Camus allegory The Guest, expects place in the unprocessed terrain of Algeria at the end of World War II. Algeria, under French check at the time, was very tense due to civil unrest of the Arabic people. The protagonist of the story is Daru, a solitary French schoolteacher who lives at a school on a remote plateau that has been ramshackle due to a freak snowstorm after eight months of drought. ii minor characters, a French policeman, Balducci, and an Arab prisoner arrive at the school. Balducci commands Daru to vacate the prisoner to nearby authorities but Daru has a conflict over the finish of whether or non to take the Arab to prison. In the end, Daru leaves the decision up to the Arab.The Arab, being a monotonic and definemingly static character, somehow contributes significantly to the existentialistic nature of Darus character and his actions. The author, an existentialist, declaims the story with an indirect pre moveation. The central appraisal appears to be there is an inherent conflict between what dissimilar grows get as morally right. We will analyze how the round/flat and high-octane/static qualities of the characters as well as the presentation affect the storys central idea.Darus character, as the protagonist, is very round. In this story, Daru lives at a remote and solitary schoolhouse plagued by silence. Daru is confronted by the decision of whether or not he should deliver an Arab prisoner to the French authorities. We go through the prisoner is in custody for murdering his cousin over grain owed. The flat character, Balducci, represents the French authority and its moral code while the Arabs culture seems to permit this act His village was beginning to stir they wanted to take him binding (105). Balducci gives his fellow Frenchman Daru an obligation to deliver the prisoner.Daru, who is utterly disgusted by the actions of the Arab, does not want to take him to police headquarters because of his existentialist beliefs either bit of this disgusts me, and first of all your fellow here. But I wint hand him over (106). That mans stupid execration revolted him, but to hand him over was contrary to honor (110). We can see that Daru is torn between what is actually right or wrong. He wants the Arab to fall because he doesnt want to plant the choice himself. He was astonied at the unmixed joy he derived from the mere thought that the Arab efficacy have fled and that he would be alone with no decision to make (107).Darus character is very dynamic. At first he refuses to realise the Arab to justice due to his existentialist beliefs. We can tell that Balducci looks checkmate on the Arab while Daru, views him more humanely. Daru insists that the Arab doesnt need to be tied up. Balduccis character is static. He claims he doesnt like putting ropes on prisoners but concludes by saying But you cant permit them have their way (106). Daru insulted Balducci by not wanting to comply with him. afterwards remembering Balduccis farewell, he reveals He had hurt him, for he had sent him off in a way as if he didnt want to be associated with him, and he mat up strangely empty (110). The Arabs character remains somewhat static throughout the story. The Arab got up some(prenominal) times the night before, as if almost wanting to escape, but came back in. With the task of delivering the prisoner at hand, Darus final choice is to let the Arab choose his own fate, which was totally not what Balducci intended. The Arab does what he feels is right, or what he feels the governing society feels is right. He complies with French equity, while ironically, Daru didnt.The presentation is as well very important in supporting the central idea of this story. A major revolt against the French colonists was about to take place. French halt and law was in question. Should one culture be able to impose laws upon another culture just because it is temporarily the governing body? In the meantime, Daru c ooked for the Arab and ate with him, showing him trust and compassion. The Arab was surprised that Daru was eating with him. We can tell the Arab was scared and wanted Daru to go with him. During bedtime, Daru slept naked near the prisoner. This shows that Daru was letting down his guard Men who share the same rooms, soldiers or prisoners, develop a strange alliance as if, having cast off their armor with their robes (109). He watched as the prisoner quietly crept out of bed. The Arab was very neuronal and got up several times, but Daru didnt do anything. He was free hoping the Arab would escape so he wouldnt have to deal with the all told situation.The next day the two hiked down the plateau towards the jailhouse. There, Daru showed the Arab the path to the prison, but also showed him the way towards pasture kills where nomads lived Theyll take you in and shelter you according to their law (111). The Arabultimately chose the fate that French law had dictated. When Daru went bac k to the schoolhouse, he take up a message on the chalkboard, you handed over our brother, you will deliver for this (111). Here again, we see a conflict of views. Daru, upon not making a choice, inadvertently committed a crime amongst those people. Throughout the story, Daru referred to the Arab as the guest.The banter of this story is Daru is actually the stranger in a strange land while we might perceive the Arab as the guest. In conclusion, we see that different cultures have conflicting views about what is right and what is wrong. As an existentialist, Daru let the Arab ascertain his own fate. Daru felt if he took the Arab to jail, it would be wrong. He also felt if he told him to go free, it would be wrong against the French authority. Because Daru acted by not acting, he unintentionally committed a crime against the Algerian people. Ironically, Daru was in a catch 22.