Finland's school success what Americans keep Ignoring Article

Finlands school achiever what Americans keep Ignoring - article ExampleHowever, some of the best campuses are private owned, and they are profit making institutions. They charge game costs for tuition and can only be afforded by the select few in the untaught (The Atlantic).Unlike American system of training that focuses on standardized tests, Finland has only one exceptional interrogation the National Matriculation Exam, which is the equivalent of a high school test,. Although pupils and students in Finland are given key out cards, the teachers base the performance on individual assessments. The Finland teachers are trained to evaluate the performance of the pupils and students at commutative and personal perspective. The Government only confirms the progress of the students by carrying out periodic tests with few groups of the teachers (The Atlantic).The American education policy rests on the theme of the competition (The Atlantic). This is not the case with Finland. The in stitutions in Finland are merited harmonise to how well they cooperate with other and not in regard to their competitive advantage. The country does not cite the best of the best in curriculum performance. The approach to giving quality education t its residents, whole students from whichever backgrounds are treated equal. All the pupils are awarded free meals, health care and personalized guidance.What the Americans keep ignoring from the success of Finland schools is that they are using the wrong approach to improve the level of education. The Americans need to look at candor in providing education, award less homework and more creativity tests, stop the competitive attitude and parent cooperation and evaluate performance of the students from an independent view. The Americans have not yet adopted the Finland system since they are focal point issues that are just the opposite of what Finland supports such as private sector involvement and competition. A similar state