Bill Recommendation Essay

Is it a good idea for those individuals convicted of arm robbery to receive double the excoriate that it is now? In my scene the arrange is no. Policy making in the field of felon referee is extremely vital to society. Punishments can be very confound in the fact of what is appropriate. What is too much and what is too little? in that respect have been m all studies that show that there is little or no deterrent of detestation such as arm robbery when the penalty is a long sentence to prison house. The reason for this lack of deterrent is be start the psyche who is clotheting the umbrage or crimes knows what is at stake, yet he or she chooses to commit the robbery any(prenominal)way. This is because the gains of that robbery outweigh the prison sentence.The main purpose of this distinction is to layover or at least lessen the amount of armed robbery that is being committed by putting those who commit the crime behind bars for a longer period of time. This seems like a good idea at first glance. However there is more(prenominal) to this proposition. Lengthening the prison sentence is being used as a deterrent or to simply take the bad guys off the track for longer. This has not worked in the past and will not work now. veneering a long sentence has not deterred robbery from happening.If prison sentencing was becoming robbery would not be around in society specially not as frequent as it is today. According to a analyse done by the FBI in 2006 447,403 robberies were reported to the police, which equals out to a score of one robbery per minute in the fall in States (McGoey, 2014). The penalization for robbery can be up to 25 years in the United States. Doubling that and making the sentence 50 years will but trace any change in the robbery rate. If anything it would just cause the jails and prisons tobecome overpopulated quicker, costing taxpayers more money. bloom RecommendationThere ar more effective ways to address a crime than make the punishments more intense or longer. The mere instruct of criminology is what I hind end my recommendation on. In the late 1700s, which are the time that the classical school came about, the punishment for crimes was extremely cruel and would be seen today as barbaric. Cesare de Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham vie a tremendous role in the theory of criminology and roughshod justice today would not be where it is without them. Their main focus was to lessen the sour punishments implemented by the judicial system at the time (Schmalleger, 2012).Cesare de Baccaria believed that preventing crimes would make a society more than punishing someone who committed a crime. This belief was the driving force of the classic school of criminology. He believed the punishment should fit the crime for instance theft should be punished finished the use of fines and crimes that cause personal injury to be punished by corporal punishment. This would, in turn he believed, prevent these crimes fro m happening. Jeremy Bentham viewed crime a little differently than Beccaria. Bentham was viewed as a utilitarian. He believed that the punishment for any crime must be that of the greater good for the community. Basically stating that any pain being used as a punishment towards an offender must be justified to benefit the good of the society.Modern criminal justice still holds its foundation in that of the classic school of criminology. Having tell that, long prison sentences do act as a major(ip) deterrent for many criminals, but poses a major conflict of ideas to that of the classic school of thought due to the fact that crimes are committed establish on free will and rational thinking.There are Bill Recommendationmany factors such as emotional instability in s sudden moment, and mental and physical disorders that a longer prison sentence simply would not abolish. There is also the very likely chance that drugs and or alcoholic drink is involved.If the offender is being driven by an addiction nothing, surely not a longer prison sentence is going to persuade his or her decision (Schmalleger, 2012)With all of that being said, the answer to decreasing crime, more specifically armed robbery, a longer prison sentence is not the answer. The question at hand is what is the answer? This is a question that is going to be debated as long as crime is resent in the population. Juvenile criminals usually mature into adult criminals, so perhaps putting more criminal tension on fresh crime must be done. In addition to everything, it is well know that drugs are the foundation of many crimes. Drugs are responsible for many thefts and robberies, and more time behind bars is not going to make a drug addict think twice before robbing someone. More emphasis needs to be put on the war on drugs and alcohol addiction. Put the taxpayers money to good use by stopping the outspread of drugs, not on paying for more people inside if jails. Lets stop the robberies from happening.Re ferencesMcGoey, C.E. (2014). Robbery Facts Violent Crime Against Persons. Retrieved from http//www.crimedoctorSchmalleger, F. (2012). Criminology Today An Integrative Introduction (6th ed.). Retrieved from The University of capital of Arizona eBook Collection database.