Midterm Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Midterm - Term Paper representativePro-choice According to consequentialist theory, the results or consequences of actions (i.e. pain versus pleasure) are the primary relevant feature in evaluating actions. Consequentialist defend abortion responsibilitys typically argue that without the opportunity to decide independently issues essential to onenesss being and existence, such as reproduction, ones critical faculties and amendeous enlightenment are compromised. Reproductive choice is a freedom so extreme to ones being that to withhold it from women is also to threaten their personhood by suppressing precisely those abilities that make one human the scruples and the intellect (Luker 77). Put a nonher way, denying women reproductive choice--turning the fact that women can bear children into the assumption that they (legally or quasi(prenominal) legally) should-- impart make them in some measure less human by essentially turning reach their intellect and moral faculties, the sin e qua non of humanness. In Beauvoirs terms, a capable actor is one possessed of moral and intellectual freedoms. Without these freedoms, political participation, democracys modus operandi, is either hampered by a diminished quality of participation, as certain disadvantaged groups participate less effectually, or is altogether impaired, as these groups are so reduced in their philanthropy as to feel incapable, or excluded or alienated from the process. Without reproductive rights, including the right to choose or not choose abortion, individuals are denied freedoms so fundamental to their humanity, their intellect and morality, as to be ill-served to undertake any effective political and social engagement. The control of ones body denied by abortion prohibitions is the most basic civil right in democratic society, with deep roots in American political breeding. In 1891, the Court give tongue to The right to ones person may be said to be a right of complete impedance to be let alone (Union Pacific, R. R. v. Botsford, 251). In her exhaustive analysis of abortion rights, Christine Luker borrows from Herbert Marcuse to argue that control of ones body is a precondition of conscious engagement in social life (Christine 74). Marcuse posits that a connectedness with ones body is a precondition for the development of personality and the participation of individuals in social life (Herbert 72-78). Luker writes, drawing on Marcuses theory of the body and political activity, that control over ones body is a fundamental aspect of this immediacy, this receptivity that is open and that opens itself to experience , which is a requirement of being a person and engaging in conscious activity (Luker 4). Thus the right to chart ones reproductive destiny helps to ensure that womens humanity comprising their feelings, intellect, and sacred nature is not being suppressed, that they are not being relegated to the status of other where they languish in immanence and stagnation. In being denied the right to make the choice of whether or not to bear a child by being deprived of a right to abortion, women are not only denied the right to undertake the complicated moral reasoning and critical thought necessary for a decision in this important matter, but they are, more fundamentally, diminished as people. The reproductive choice is left, entirely in the give of doctors (who decide as they see fit whether or not bearing a child will harm the pregnant woman). For this